Sermon: Rosh Hashanah 1st Day
“What Did We Learn For Our Lives From Bernie Madoff?”
Metuchen 2009/5770
Rabbi Gerald L. Zelizer
You know how in an Italian barber shop
the chit-chat is as important as the haircut? Well, I am sitting in the barber's
chair overhearing a conversation between my barber, an Italian, and a customer,
also Italian, who shared a recent experience. Each had recent hernia operations
but with different doctors. My barber’s went well and he was back at work in
three days. The customer's operation had complications. After two weeks he was
still in pain and bent over. My barber, the Italian, says to the customer, the
Italian: “I love Italy and Italians but when it comes to a doctor - (excuse me
for saying this, Rabbi!) I go to a Jew.” The popular superiority of Jewish
physicians is one label we apparently still enjoy in 2009.
The other bragging point, of course,
is the dispropionate number of Jewish Nobel Prize winners relative to the
population. You know the familiar stats. Only 2 ½ % of the population, but 35%
of Nobel Prize winners in the arts and sciences. We have all basked in those
numbers.
Along comes Bernie Madoff to upset the
Jewish – Italian equation. Yes, we are so superior that the Jew Madoff replaced
the Italian Ponzi as the shyster poster-boy of the pyramid academy. We can hope
for some solace if the world also remembers Enron’s Kenneth Lay - Wasp, pillar
of his Episcopal church. But who knows? Kenneth Lay is already old news. With
reason, our sensitivity to the reaction of the non-Jewish world to the Madoff
the Jew is born of historical reality. After all, we were portrayed as Greedy
Shylocks. Steve Pearlsein of the Washington Post summarizes our instinctive fears:
“Arthur Goldberg to the Supreme Court, that was good. The espionage trial of
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, that was not so good. The Godfather films that was
good – it put a spotlight on another ethnic group that had bad apples. Sandy
Kaufax refusing to pitch a World Series game on Yom Kippur – that was bad – it
could have encouraged anti-Semitism among Dodger fans.”
But beyond our instinctive reaction,
“What will the Goyim think?” Did we learn anything about ourselves as Jews from
the Madoff mess? More importantly did we learn anything about our own lives,
from the Madoff mess? I think so. Let me tell you some lessons life I think we
learned.
The paradigm statement regarding
Jewish cohesiveness is (Ethics of the Fathers) “Kol Yisrael Erevim Zeh Lazeh”
– “All Israel is responsible for one another.” Pre-Madoff we were accustomed to
boast how we Jews took care of our own. Yes, there were Jews on welfare, but
few numbers relative to other populations, because our outstanding Jewish
social services stepped in. Some years ago, in Detroit, Michigan the United
Fund studied both the fundraising method of the United Jewish Appeal and
allocations to beneficiary agencies. They wanted to learn from our successful
philanthropic method. Even the Madoff mess did not mute the Jewish impetus to tzedakah. Remarkably, on December 23, of
last year, very soon after the first public knowledge of the scandal,
representatives of the largest Jewish foundations met to discuss how they could
compensate for the millions of dollars in loss to the non-profit Jewish
institutions which been financially crippled.
Nevertheless, we did see here the ugly
under belly of Jewish cohesiveness. Scholars call this the “affinity crime” –
preying on those you know best. Did you know that our daily service warns of
the affinity fraud? At the beginning of the service, before we pray anything
else, we ask God to save us from predators, and then the Siddur adds “ Bein Shehu Ben Brit Bein Shehu Eino Ben
Brit”
– “even if they are of our own kind, children of the covenant.” So the first
lesson we learned is that Jewish cohesiveness is double edged.
Back to lessons we learn from our lives in a moment, after a short
detour.
If Bernie Madoff were sitting here
this A.M., any Torah I would like to bring to his attention? You bet! How
about? 1. Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the
blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the LORD? (Leviticus 19:18) How about: 2.
(Leviticus 19:11) - A person is
forbidden to act in a smooth-tongued and luring manner. He should not
speak one thing outwardly and think otherwise in his heart. Rather, his
inner self should be like the self which he shows to the world. Or how
about: 3. Our rabbis taught: ‘Where money was given to an agent to buy wheat
and he bought with it barley, or barley and he bought with it wheat,’ it was
taught, there was a loss, he would sustain the loss but if there was a profit,
the profit would be divided between them.’ How about from the Mishnah? It is
forbidden to deceive people, even a non-Jew. For example: one should not
sell a Gentile the meat of an animal which has not been ritually slaughtered as
if it were ritually slaughtered meat. One should not press his colleague to
share a meal with him when he knows that his colleague will not accept the
invitation, nor should he press presents upon him when he knows that his
colleague will not accept them. He should not open wine [supposedly] for
his colleague which he must open anyway for sale, in order to deceive him into
thinking that they have been opened in his honor. Or how about: 5. Rabbi Shimon
said: “There are three crowns: the crown of Torah, the crown of priesthood and
the crown of kingship. But the crown of a good name surpasses them all.”
Back to what we learn for our lives.
I think we learn something though from Madoff way beyond the
particulars that we all know – something that relates to our own personal lives
on this Rosh Hashanah. We read of the painful loss of some of the senior
victims like those who had to put their homes up for sale and were forced to
move in with their grown children. Lots of investors in New Jersey were
particularly hard hit because of out state’s proximity to Wall Street. For
example Loretta Weinberg, a state senator from Teaneck, who at the age of 73
lost her life’s savings. Another Jewish resident of New Jersey, Burt Ross, the
former mayor of Fort Lee and a real estate firm owner, who also lost a large
chunk – five million dollars of his net worth. How did they react and what did
they say about Madoff? Loretta Weinberg from Teaneck said “I don’t believe I
will have any recourse over this loss in my lifetime. But I am determined not
to make this the centerpiece of my life. I have to budget myself very carefully
over the next several years.” Last January, Mr. Ross from Ft. Lee said “I felt
very little anger during this whole thing, until I started reading about those
elderly people who have been affected. For me it is not the end of the world.
You realize that most of what you do is more luxury than necessity. You cut
back on vacations and eating out – that’s not a tragedy.” But by June, Mr. Ross
from Ft. Lee was saying: “Bernard Madoff should suffer in the lowest depths of
hell.”
Perhaps the most remarkable reaction was from Ian Theirman of Ben
Lomand, California. The man ran a preservatory and pest control company and
retired twenty-five years ago. He is ninety-years old. He lost all of his
savings, $700,000.00, to Madoff, money he needs for home payments and his
wife’s ailments. What did he do and what is his attitude? Thierman took a job
for $10.00 an hour as a greeter at a local supermarket, where he greets
customers and points them to their shopping needs. Is he bitter? He says “I
have no time to feel sorry for myself or to dwell on Madoff. I have a job to
do.” The owner of the supermarket told AP news that Thierman has been inspiring
to others who have suffered serious setbacks in life.
We can take a perspective for our own lives from Ian Thierman and
Loretta Weinberg that we don’t learn from Burt Ross, or even the actress Jane
Fonda, who said “I want to shake Madoff until his teeth fall out.” Loretta
Weinberg from Teaneck and Ian Thierman from California laments their bad
fortune, but they will not wallow in their bad fortunes. They will move on and
reconstitute their blessings. That echoes the epics of the father “Aizeh Hu
Ashir- Ha sameach B’Chelko” – “Who is rich? The person who is content with his
lot.”
Thankfully, I think there is no one in
this sanctuary who was directly devastated by the Madoff mess. But having
served you for so many years, I am painfully aware of other personal life
devastations in this congregation – some of us with the economy, some of with
family, some of us with spouse or children, some of us with ourselves. How does
one take on the attitude of a Loretta Weinberg when met by the most challenging
problems and defeats of our lives? That leads me to the second lesson for us
derived from the Madoff affair. We are not entitled to anything in life. What
we have both materially and spiritually and health is unearned life interest.
We just talked of how some older people responded healthily to the
life blow of being wiped out by Madoff. Let me apply this theme to those of you
who are younger. I want to frame my example with a report by Professor Marshall
Grossman, an English Professor at the University of Maryland. He tells of
students who engage him in grade disputes. He says “Many students come in with
the conviction that they work hard and deserve a higher mark.” He attributes
those complaints to a “student's sense of entitlement.” “I tell my classes that
if they just do what they are supposed to do and meet the standard
requirements, they will earn a C. That is the default grade. They see the
default grade as an A.” Another professor, Ellen Greenberger, at the University
of California, studied this sense of entitlement among the youth in college and
found that much of it comes from increased parental pressure, competition among
peers, and ultra-efficiency in test preparation. There is a mentality in
students that “If I work hard, I deserve an excellent grade.”
But as with many of us who are older,
young students may find that they may work harder, but still not receive the
grade they want. Working hard is a good habit: working hard is not an
entitlement for the perfect grade. By understanding that there are no
entitlements in life we can react properly to the blows that life may hand us,
whether they are of the Madoff kind or any other kind. Is that not what our
Mahzor will say on Yom Kippur “Mah Hayenu…, Mah Tzedkenu…. Mah Kocheni…, Mah
Gevuratenu, etc.”
– “What is our life; our righteousness, our attainment, our might?” Notice the
Mahzor does not say “We have no life; we have no righteousness; we have no
attainment!” It just says that in spite of having a life, inspite of our
righteousness; inspite of our attainment, a good ultimate outcome is not
guaranteed. That is, we are not entitled.
There is yet one more lesson for us in
our daily lives from the Madoff mess. It has to do with this time of days of
awe and “Heshbon Hanefesh”
– “taking spiritual stock.” Let’s each ask ourselves, would we have done what
Madoff did if we had the chance? Would I have done what Madoff (or what the
rabbis in Deal) did if I had a chance? Of course we are adamant: “We would never
do it. Never. We would never deliberately inflict that kind of pain on another
person. We would never take advantage of someone else and destroy them for our
own financial gain.” Well, in recent years social psychologists have began to
study what they call the “holier than thou effect”. What they have learned is
our tendency to inflate our own sense of moral superiority especially when we
see overt scoundrels like Madoff. We do feel moral indignation. We believe that
we wouldn’t do it. But says one social psychologist, David Dunning, at Cornell
University “The point is that many types of behavior are driven far more by the
situation than by the personality.” In other words, it depends not on our moral
principles, but on the situation. I’ll spare you all the studies that prove
this point, but they do.
And more. Religion is double edged. On the one hand it can temper
our feelings of moral superiority. That is why we are going through this ten
day period of “Heshbon Hanefesh”
– “spiritual stock taking” – because we will end up at Al Chet – confessing on
Yom Kippur our pathetic inability to live up to our moral principles. But on
the other hand, the studies found that religion sometimes amplifies the
instinct to feel morally superior to feel “holier than thou,” or in this case,
“holier than Madoff.” Like the words of a bumper sticker by our co-religionists
Christians “Jesus loves you, but I’m his favorite.” So the final lesson we
learn from the Madoff affair is that inspite of our heartfelt moral indignation
under the right circumstances, because of our human frailty, we cannot say
absolutely that we would not do the same. “ Al
Chet Shechatanu Lefanecha B’Masa Uvmatan “For
the sin that we have sinned against you in business.”
So we have learned much from Uncle
Bernie Madoff, about the Jewish community; about our reaction to big bumps in
our lives; our own feeling of self-righteousness, and our sense of moral
superiority.
But let me finish on an up note. That is after all the way of the
Jewish religion. Did you know that in selecting the Haftorot that we chant on
every Shabbat and holiday after the Torah readings, if a typical Haftorah from
a prophet ends on a down note, the tradition will tack onto that haftarah a
passage from another unrelated prophet which includes an upbeat message. In
that spirit, let me not dwell on the possibility of human malice, even between
Jews, but on human nobility, as extended to Jews. Two examples – the first
cited by President Obama in a speech last spring in marking Yom Hashoah at the
Capital.
“We also remember the number five
thousand – the number of Jews rescued by the villagers of Le Chambon, France –
one Jewish life saved by each of those five thousand residents. Not a single
Jew who came there was turned away or turned in. But it was not until decades
later that the villagers spoke of what they had done and even then, only
reluctantly. The author of a book on the rescue found that those interviewed
were baffled by his interest. “How could you call us “good”, they said. “We
were doing what had to be done.”
And for the
second example of human nobility, acknowledging an anti-Madoff. He is Salem, Massachusetts
businessman and philanthropist Robert Lappin, 87, who personally lost up to 90
million dollars to Madoff. In addition, all the 5 million dollars the employees
of his company had contributed to their retirement funds were wiped out. What
did Robert Lappin do? He took from his remaining personal funds and made whole
the 5 million that his employees had lost. He told the Boston Globe “I wanted
to do the right thing. And that, to me, is my reward.”
If the scoundrels do what they do to
advance their own interests in spite of anyone else, then the righteous do what
they do not to advance their own interests, but because it is what should be done.”
I pray that in 5770 you, I, derive from the Madoff mess lessons from your own
life. I pray that whatever our shocks and blows, each of us does really what
should be done.